synthesize...

Michael Moore and James w. smith, the writer of my article, had very similar and basic ideas for there own sort of reports. Each of them discussed a topic of which was or is a major concern during the year that produced their reports. Moore was discussing the unemployment in Flint, Michigan were as James was discussing the recession of 2008 and because of the recession there will be an decrease in jobs with the resulting increase of unemployment.

Yet another aspect in which they both sort of did the same e was attacking the corporate or federal guys for, messing up or deliberately doing what was best for them. But with that Moore did something different he obtained testimonials of people of the state he was documenting, and added a whole other area of pathos and logos. As for James, he only obtained the facts for his article leaving it in a way that it was sort of dull. But Michael Moore’s documentary was intriguing were as James’s article was in its own statistical way of being intriguing.

In regards to what both writers were trying to announce to other readers, besides my self, I believe that they came off informing and showing what each of their points were. However, Moore pulled off in a more boastful manner with intensity to really, really prove his point and in a way himself. Though, James seemed to merely just get across his point, in a more subtle, yet apparent manner.